My 1,700+ followers on Twitter may have caught a few of my tweets recently about my frustration with Twitter’s 2,000 follow limit. That is, one can only follow up to 2,000 people until one’s own followers has caught up to that number.

As it turns out, one’s followers only have to reach 1,850 before one can add more follows. (For those of you that don’t really understand what I’m talking about, please join twitter and follow me, and I’ll be happy to explain further. Or, watch Commoncraft’s ‘Twitter In Plain English’.)

I learned this new information last night, as I saw that I had surpassed 1,800 followers and was also now following 2,013 tweeters. This ratio had apparently been “approved” by the twitter code and database, allowing me to continue to find more great people to tweet with. I understand that Twitter needs some type of processs or security against spammers, who generally follow hundreds of tweeters without reciprocal follows using scripts and other techniques. For this reason, new twitter users soon learn the value of gauging the ratio of follows to followers, filtering for spammers. Basically, if you don’t “earn” the followers, you’ll be limited to 2,000 people…

Also last night, the Twitter team chose to eliminate accounts they judged as spam accounts. I woke up to about 90 less “followers” and was only now following about 1,975. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t want to follow or be followed by spammers, but this couldn’t have happened at a worse time for me. I’m now once again struggling with the 2K barrier designed to thwart spammers — and only because all the spammers were removed.

Every community needs spam and abuse measures. However, Twitter’s 2K barrier is an over-simplistic measure that should have other checks and balances that don’t limit power users like me. If followers see that my follow-to-follower ratio is suspect, they can choose not to follow me. This is allowing the community and users to self-police.

I should be back up to 1,850 soon enough, but a little more thought should have been put into this measure. Say, once a user has passed the 1,850 mark, dropping under again no longer applies; or, before the Twitter team hits the big trapdoor lever to dump spammers, they could have thought about how this would affect their user types… With such “simple and elegant” functionality, one would think that this wouldn’t be too long a conversation.